Showing posts with label Law Enforcement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law Enforcement. Show all posts

Sunday, May 17, 2020

EXAMINING THE CHALLENGES OF POLICING ECONOMIC CYBERCRIME IN THE UK

When preparing this review use was made of trialling numerous AI (artificial intelligence) tools to assist in the collection of standard definition terms and the article's reference sources. The purpose in using AI tools is determine if the tools produce inaccuracies and, if it is found, such tools can accurately produce validated results this could assist Digital Forensics, Incident Response, Cyber Security, Law Enforcement and the Criminal Justice System etc.

EXAMINING THE CHALLENGES OF POLICING ECONOMIC CYBERCRIME IN THE UK
Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi, Şubat 2020,UGK Özel Sayısı, 113-134

DOI:10.28956/ gbd.695956


  • Introduction:

     The advent of the Internet and its commercial applications have significantly changed the way the authors socialise, shop or communicate.
  • It is argued that the commercial application of the Internet has provided new opportunities for the commission of the traditional crime, but it has given rise to new forms of crimes (Wall, 2007b; Lee, Holt, Burruss, and Bossler, 2019).
  • Action Fraud reported that Internet users lost £34.6m as a result of cybercrime between April and September 2018, which indicates a %24 rise when compared to the previous 6 months (BBC, 2019)
  • Objectives:

     The aims of this research were two-fold: documenting the problems experienced by police officers working in cybercrime departments and discerning police officers’ perceptions related to the role of police in the wider policing assemblage.
  • Methods:

     In order to address this knowledge gap in the literature, ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with police officers working in cybercrime departments in the UK and three semi-structured interviews were done with experts working on IT departments of the local governments.
  • The research was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 2001).
  • Interviewees were provided participant information sheets explaining interview and transcription processes prior to interviews.
  • Participants were asked to sign consent forms before the interviews.
  • Interviews were conducted face-to-face at police departments.
  • Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim by authors after the interviews
  • Results:

     Analysis of interviews conducted with police officers and cybercrime experts suggests that policing economic cybercrime is a multidimensional complex issue involving both national and international actors together with police forces.
  • Interviews with police officers revealed the lack of international cooperation as the key challenge to policing economic cybercrime.
  • Participants acknowledged that non-European countries were reluctant to share information related to online perpetrators.
  • “The companies sit in Luxemburg, Panama or Gibraltar are reluctant to share information.
  • It is difficult to catch them and bring to the jurisdiction crime happened.” (Participant 4)
  • Conclusion:

     Despite the growing cyber threat and cybersecurity concerns among the public, there is a lack of empirical research on discerning the challenges of policing economic cybercrime.
  • This result which confirms the previous studies indicates that governments or international and transnational actors have failed to collaborate to combat cybercrime globally.National and international initiatives such as UK Cybercrime Strategy 2016/2021 place emphasis upon reducing disparities among national jurisdictions and creating strong coordination between policing bodies and other private and governmental actors of cybersecurity to alleviate policing problems of cybercrime (Ellis and Mohan, 2019)
  • Despite these efforts, there is lack of empirical studies on this issue.
  • ENISA or another agency should actively seek to collaborate with non-EU countries
 
ARTICLE REFERENCE SOURCES
 
  • Akhgar, B., Choras, M., Brewster, B., Bosco, F., Veermeersch, E., Luda, V., Puchalski, D., and Wells, D. (2016) 'Consolidated Taxonomy and Research Roadmap for Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism', pp. 295-322 in B. Akhgar and B. Brewster (eds) Combatting cybercrime and cyberterrorism: challenges, trends and priorities: Springer. ↩
  • Anderson, R., Barton, C., Böhme, R., Clayton, R., Van Eeten, M. J., Levi, M., Moore, T., and Savage, S. (2013) 'Measuring the Cost of Cybercrime', pp. 265300 in The economics of information security and privacy: Springer.
  • Barthelemy, J. (2003) 'The seven deadly sins of outsourcing', Academy of Management Perspectives 17(2): 87-98. ↩
  • Bayley, D. H., and Shearing, C. D. (1996) 'The future of policing', Law Society Review 30: 585. ↩
  • BBC (2019) UK cyber-crime victims lose £190,000 a day. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47016671 (Accessed:14/09/2019.
  • Blanco Hache, A. C., and Ryder, N. (2011) '’Tis The Season to (be Jolly?) WiseUp to Online Fraudsters. Criminals on The Web Lurking to Scam Shoppers this Christmas: A Critical Analysis of the United Kingdom's Legislative Provisions and Policies to Tackle Online Fraud', Information & Communications Technology Law 20(1): 35-56.
  • Boes, S., and Leukfeldt, E. R. (2017) 'Fighting Cybercrime: A Joint Effort' in R. M. Clark and S. Hakim (eds) Cyber-physical security: protecting critical infrastructure at the state and local level: Springer. ↩
  • Bond, E., and Tyrrell, K. (2018) 'Understanding revenge pornography: A national survey of police officers and staff in England and Wales', Journal of interpersonal violence: 0886260518760011. ↩
  • Bossler, A. M., and Holt, T. J. (2012) 'Patrol officers' perceived role in responding to cybercrime', Policing: an international journal of police strategies & management 35(1): 165-181. ↩
  • Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006) 'Using thematic analysis in psychology', Qualitative research in psychology 3(2): 77-101. ↩
  • Brenner, S. W. (2001) 'Is There Such a Thing as' Virtual Crime'?'. ↩
  • ---. (2004) 'Cybercrime Metrics: Old Wine, New Bottles?', VA. JL & TECH. 9: 13. ---. (2007) 'The Council of Europe’s Convention on Cybercrime', pp. 207-221 in J. ↩
  • Balkin, J. Grimmelmann, E. Katz, N. Kozlovski, S. Wagman and T. Zarsky (eds) Cybercrime: digital cops in a networked environment: NYU Press.
  • Brenner, S. W. (2010) Cybercrime: Criminal Threats from Cyberspace: USA: Prager. ↩
  • Button, M. (2019) Private policing: Routledge. ↩
  • Casey, E. (2011) 'Language of Computer Crime Investigation', pp. 35-48 in E. Casey (ed.), Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers, and the Internet. London: Elsevier. ↩
  • Clough, J. (2014) 'A World of Difference: The Budapest Convention of Cybercrime and the Challenges of Harmonisation', Monash UL Rev. 40: 698. ↩
  • Dolliver, D. S., and Poorman, K. (2018) 'Understanding Cybercrime', pp. 139-160 in P. L. Reichel and R. Randa (eds) Transnational Crime and Global Security [2 volumes]: ABC-CLIO. Ellis, R., and Mohan, V. (2019) Rewired: Cybersecurity Governance: John Wiley & Sons. European Commission (2007) Towards a General Policy on the Fight Against Cyber Crime Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri= COM:2007:0267:FIN:EN:PDF.--- (2019) The EU cybersecurity certification framework. Available at:https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/eu-cybersecurity-certificationframework (Accessed:17/08/2019. ↩
  • Finn, B. M. (2019) 'Recommendations for a hybridized public private law enforcement approach'. Garland, D. (1996) 'THE LIMITS OF THE SOVEREIGN STATEStrategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society', The British journal of criminology 36(4): 445-471. ↩
  • Gercke, M. (2012) Understanding Cybercrimes: Phenomena, Challenges and Legal Response: International Telecommunication Union. ↩
  • Gordon, S., and Ford, R. (2006) 'On the Definition and Classification of Cybercrime', Journal in Computer Virology 2(1): 13-20. ↩
  • Grabosky, P., and Smith, R. (2001) 'Telecommunications Fraud in the Digital Age: the Convergence of Technologies', pp. 23-43 in D. Wall (ed.), Crime and the Internet. London: Routledge. ↩
  • Grabosky, P. N. (2001) 'Virtual criminality: Old wine in new bottles?', Social & Legal Studies 10(2): 243-249. ↩
  • Graham, L. (2017) Cybercrime costs the global economy $450 billion: CEO. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/07/cybercrime-costs-the-globaleconomy-450-billion-ceo.html (Accessed:06/08/2019 2019). ↩
  • Hadlington, L., Lumsden, K., Black, A., and Ferra, F. (2018) 'A qualitative exploration of police officers’ experiences, challenges, and perceptions of cybercrime', Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. ↩
  • Hayes, N. (1997) 'Theory-led thematic analysis: Social identification in small companies'. ↩
  • Holt, T. J., Bossler, A. M., and Fitzgerald, S. (2010) 'Examining state and local law enforcement perceptions of computer crime', Crime on-line: Correlates, causes, and context: 221-246. ↩
  • Holt, T. J., Burruss, G. W., and Bossler, A. M. (2018) 'An examination of English and Welsh constables’ perceptions of the seriousness and frequency of online incidents', Policing and Society: 1-16. ↩
  • Holt, T. J., Lee, J. R., Liggett, R., Holt, K. M., and Bossler, A. (2019) 'Examining perceptions of online harassment among constables in England and Wales', International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence & Cybercrime 2(1): 24-39. ↩
  • Home Office (2014) The Serious and Organised Crime Strategy, London. ↩
  • --- (2018) CONTEST: The United Kingdom’s Strategy for Countering Terrorism, London. ↩
  • James, J. I., and Gladyshev, P. (2015) A Survey of International Cooperation in Digital Investigations, International Conference on Digital Forensics and Cyber Crime (pp. 103-114): Springer. ↩
  • Joh, E. E. (2019) 'Policing the smart city', International Journal of Law in Context 15(2): 177-182. ↩
  • Koops, B.-J. (2010) 'The internet and its opportunities for cybercrime'. ↩
  • Kshetri, N. (2010a) 'The Global Cybercrime Industry and Its Structure: Relevant Actors, Motivations, Threats, and Countermeasures', pp. 1-34 in The Global Cybercrime Industry: Springer. ↩
  • ---. (2010b) 'Structure of Cybercrime in Developing Economies', pp. 165-188 in The Global Cybercrime Industry: Springer. ↩
  • ---. (2013) 'Cybercrime and cyber-security issues associated with China: some economic and institutional considerations', Electronic Commerce Research 13(1): 41-69.
  • Lam, P. T. (2019) 'Public–Private Partnerships for Fire, Police, and Ambulance Services', pp. 153-165 in Public Private Partnerships: Springer. ↩
  • Lee, J. R., Holt, T. J., Burruss, G. W., and Bossler, A. M. (2019) 'Examining English and Welsh Detectives’ Views of Online Crime', International Criminal Justice Review: 1057567719846224. ↩
  • Levi, M., Doig, A., Gundur, R., Wall, D., and Williams, M. L. (2015) The Implications of Economic Cybercrime for Policing: City of London Corporation. Available at: https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/business/economicresearch-and-information/research-publications/Documents/Research2015/Economic-Cybercrime-FullReport.pdf. (Accessed:11 June 2017). ↩
  • Maguire, M., and Delahunt, B. (2017) 'Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, stepby-step guide for learning and teaching scholars', AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 9(3). ↩
  • Malby, S., Mace, R., Holterhof, A., Brown, C., Kascherus, S., and Ignatuschtschenko, E. (2013) 'Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime', United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Tech. Rep. ↩
  • Nouh, M., Nurse, J. R., Webb, H., and Goldsmith, M. (2019) 'Cybercrime Investigators are Users Too! Understanding the Socio-Technical Challenges Faced by Law Enforcement', arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06961. ↩
  • Pathak, P. (2016) 'The Review of Terms and Concepts Used to Understand Cybercrime to Safeguard Ourselves from Cybercriminals', International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science 7(1). ↩
  • Petee, T. A., Corzine, J., Huff-Corzine, L., Clifford, J., and Weaver, G. (2010) 'Defining” Cyber-crime”: Issues in Determining the Nature and Scope of Computer-related Offenses,”', Futures Working Group 5: 6-11. ↩
  • Reinhart, R. J. (2018) One in Four Americans Have Experienced Cybercrime. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/245336/one-four-americansexperienced-cybercrime.aspx (Accessed:08/09/2019. ↩
  • Ruddell, R., Thomas, M. O., and Patten, R. (2011) 'Examining the roles of the police and private security officers in urban social control', International Journal of Police Science & Management 13(1): 54-69. ↩
  • Sandywell, B. (2013) 'On the Globalisation of Crime: the Internet and New Criminality', pp. 56-84 in Handbook of internet crime: Willan. ↩
  • Summerville, A. (2017) Protect against the fastest-growing crime: cyber attacks. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/25/stay-protected-from-the-ussfastest-growing-crime-cyber-attacks.html (Accessed:06/08/2019 2019). ↩
  • Taylor, G. (2002) 'The Council of Europe Cybercrime Convention a Civil Liberties Perspective', Retrieved June 13: 2006. ↩
  • The Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime. (2001) Convention on Cybercrime. In T. C. o. Europe (Ed.). Budapest: European Treaty Series - No. 185.
  • Thomas, D., and Loader, B. (2000) 'Cybercrime: Law Enforcement, Security and Surveillance in the Information Age' in D. Thomas and B. Loader (eds) Cybercrime: Law enforcement, security and surveillance in the information age. London: Routledge. ↩
  • UN Congress. (2000) Crimes Related to Computer Networks, 10th United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders. Vienna: United Nations.
  • UN Manual (1994) United Nations Manual on the Prevention and Control of Computer-Related Crime. Available at: http://216.55.97.163/wpcontent/themes/bcb/bdf/int_regulations/un/CompCrims_UN_Guide.pdf (Accessed:21/03/2017).
  • Wall, D. S. (2005) 'Digital Realism and the Governance of Spam as Cybercrime', European journal on criminal policy and research 10(4): 309-335. ↩
  • ---. (2007a) Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age: Polity.
  • ---. (2007b) Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age: Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • ---. (2008) 'Cybercrime, Media and Insecurity: The Shaping of Public Perceptions of Cybercrime', International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 22(12): 45-63.
  • ---. (2010) 'Policing Cybercrimes: Situating the Public Police in Networks of Security Within Cyberspace (Revised May 2010)', Police Practice and Research 8(2): 183-205.
  • ---. (2013a) 'Criminalising Cyberspace: The Rise of the Internet as a ‘Crime Problem’', pp. 106-121 in Handbook of Internet Crime: Willan.
  • ---. (2013b) 'Policing Identity Crimes', pp. 29-52 in D. S. Wall and M. L. Williams (eds) Policing cybercrime: networked and social media technologies and the challenges for policing: Taylor & Francis. ↩
  • Wall, D. S., and Williams, M. (2014) Policing cybercrime: networked and social media technologies and the challenges for policing: Routledge. ↩
  • Williams, M., and Levi, M. (2015) 'Perceptions of the ecrime Controllers: Modelling the Influence of Cooperation and Data Source Factors', Security Journal 28(3): 252-271. ↩
  • World Medical Association. (2001) 'World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects', Bulletin of the World Health Organization 79(4): 373.
  • Yar, M. (2005) 'The Novelty of 'Cybercrime’ an Assessment in Light of Routine Activity Theory', European Journal of Criminology 2(4): 407-427. ↩
  • ---. (2013a) Cybercrime and Society: Sage. ---. (2013b) 'The Private Policing of Internet Crime' in Y. Jewkes and M. Yar (eds) ↩
 

Sunday, October 29, 2017

Very Low Cost Training $99.00 - US Marketplace

Just been reading a post from Dennis Carroll Special Agent / Law Enforcement Instructor about some very low cost training in the States

"The Fox Valley Technical College in partnership with the National Criminal Justice Training Center (NCJTC) have approved my three day cellular device investigations course. The first course is being offered in Appleton Wisconsin in December as a pilot and then throughout the US as requested. The FVTC and NCJTC have obtained a grant to lower the cost of this course to $99. This is the lowest price you will find for a three day comprehensive cellular device investigation course. There is a link to request this course at your host agency on the link below. Please share if you would."
https://ncjtc.fvtc.edu/training/details/TR00005533/TRI0005534/cellular-device-investigations

Friday, February 19, 2016

Moral Ethics of Backdoor iPhone 5C

Backdoor iPhone 5C

The discussion below is entirely hypothetical and is not intended to make or shift people into making decisions, legally or morally, nor create detriment at all.

There has been a huge amount of press regarding the balance between lawful investigation / national security versus Apple's company policy not to backdoor their products precisely for privacy and security reasons. It is laudable stand-off Apple have created because they ask where is the demarcation between full access and privacy and security. I cannot say this is David and Goliath being played out because Apple are far too big to be labelled a minnow (unjustly facing might versus right).

However, are Apple's arguments being raised legal ones or moral ones or both. Is Apple your moral barometer in life? Does Apple think for you and make/take your moral decisions for you? Only you can answer these. Apple appear to have made a good fist of standing by their publicised policy for legal reasons and, in fairness, it is understandable, they could have a fear of being accused of misleading statements to suddenly confirm there was always a backdoor into their product. They have done well and spoken in their statement that they never tried to make one in the first place.

[u][b]Apple's Open Letter[/b][/u]
https://www.apple.com/customer-letter/
"But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone."

The public statement was made following a US Judge's Order:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2714001/SB-Shooter-Order-Compelling-Apple-Asst-iPhone.pdf

There is a point at which peoples' morals are woven in the fabric of their country's constitution where those moral become tenets that become doctrines for the society in which they wish to live. These can lead these morals being inextricably linked (not easy to disentangle) in the decision making process where an organisation like Apple might bend and could say for example "Okay, hands up, we have stood by our customers and promises we made to them but a greater good needs our help. If customers wish us to assist law enforcement and national security carefully set down by a strict and specific set of criteria allowing Apple to (firstly) build the access and (secondly) to deploy it, then we need customers' support to loosen are obligations?"  That statement is hypothetical only created for the following question to ask what would criteria do Apple customers morally consider should release Apple to allow access and deployment (backdooring)?

Below is a short list of graduated crimes against society. It is accepted straightaway that some may not figure in your moral domain (but then create one for yourself and see how you feel about it?). Put the list in order so that you create a moral demarcation where you believe Apple could (not should) allow backdooring on a single make/model of smartphone. The stage is now yours, and yours alone, as this is about you and not me, national security, law enforcement or Apple for that matter. Where do you think you feel and stand on this matter.

Place in your order of importance the below and highlight at what stage you would expect Apple to concede and backdoor their device for the greater good?

10....................backdoor device to find a burglary/car thief
9....................backdoor device to find local cannabis supplier
8..................backdoor device to find IIoC photo distributor/procurer
7................backdoor device to find people trafficker
6..............backdoor device to find arms smuggler
5...........backdoor device to find LE or civilian murderer
4.........backdoor device to find agent spreading bacterial warfare
3.......backdoor device to find murderer of national president
2.....backdoor device to find kidnapper of 30 babies from hospital
1...backdoor device to find where nuclear device placed before explodes

Remember more is less and less is more.  

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Archived Data

Archived Data

In the UK, the operators tend to vary their approach to data retention made available to law enforcement and data subjects running between weeks and a couple of years. However, data retention governed by the Directive and Legislation may go beyond that period, for instance in commercial disputes.

There are many confusing and contradicting issues associated with retention of mobile call information. The legislation appears to create a brickwall blocking unnecessary data retention. Under analysis exclusions or argumentative approaches are revealed that can give the impression that the brickwall has so many holes that it appears to have more holes than a Jeyes Cloth (J-Cloth).

For instance, the operator can give to law enforcement a Gold Copy of the records - a suggestion of the title that it contains everything, but can actually mean it is the only copy remaining. However, given the original raw data may still be with the operator, then what do all these rules really mean?

Law enforcement keep data records for considerably longer than is perceived, but that seems rather obvious when considering 'cold case' reviews.

Solicitors keep records for years in case there is an Appeal/dispute.

Both the Data Protection Act 1998 and 1984 contain requirements associated with 'processed data' and the legal position regarding a processed state and, thus, data rention periods. However, raw data that is untreated is not subject to the DPA in the same way and therefore in a raw data state may remain for many years in an unprocessed state in archive. National Security therefore could have access to archived raw data processed years after the archive was first made, but equally in a processed state data can linger on than most specified periods.

Preservation is not new of course and historically some, prior to digital archiving, had their records recorded to microfiche and as banking records were important some used inventive methods to preserve material and purchased old mines and stored their data in micorfiche format deep in the vaults of the earth in order to main a cold temperature, which if temperature increased (heat) it degraded preservation of the microfiche material. Some figures for storage were 90 years, particularly health and safety records for employees who may have been exposed to working where pervasive toxic conditions existed but weren't fully recognised at the material times.

Digital archiving today uses a range of storage media from optical disks to various data storage containment. It has been said that because of the recording properties of a SIM card data can be retained on a SIM card without degradation for upto 100 years; 50 years may be good though. So SIM maybe used under certain conditions for archive.

For mixed principles of data retention timescales the following provides useful guidance:

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

DIRECTIVE 2006/24/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 15 March 2006
on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly
available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending
Directive 2002/58/EC

Article 6
Periods of retention
Member States shall ensure that the categories of data specified in
Article 5 are retained for periods of not less than six months and
not more than two years from the date of the communication.

Download: tinyurl.com/83mjky9

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 12 July 2002
concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications)

(23) Confidentiality of communications should also be ensured in the course of lawful business practice. Where necessary and legally authorised, communications can be recorded for the purpose of providing evidence of a commercial transaction. Directive 95/46/EC applies to such processing. Parties to the communications should be informed prior to the recording about the recording, its purpose and the duration of its storage. The recorded communication should be erased as soon as possible and in any case at the latest by the end of the period during which the transaction can be lawfully challenged.

[Note: retention of data for commercial disputes is considered to be custom and trade, and this can be equivalent to six years]

weblink: eur-lex.europa.eu/LexU...058:en:NOT

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001
102 to 105 Codes and agreements about the retention of communications data

[Note allows for retention periods longer than Directive on privacy and electronic communications and the Data Protection Act (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents)

weblink: www.legislation.gov.uk...24/part/11

Friday, June 03, 2011

Update on Forensic Webblog Posts

Update on Forensic Webblog Posts

Cell Site Analysis
http://cellsiteanalysis.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------
Radio Survey Field Notes
CSA Training Explanatory Diagram
iOS 4.3.3 deletion of Location Cache
Requesting Cell Site Data

Forensic Mobile Examination
http://forensicmobex.blogspot.com
---------------------------------
Handset Examination in 1995
sn0wbreeze unthethering Windows iPhones
Symbian OS v9.4, Series 60 rel. 5


Examination and Evidence from SIM and USIM Cards
http://sim2usim.blogspot.com
----------------------------
Answer To Reset (ATR)
Blackberry Forensic Analysis


Billing & Call Detail Record Analysis
http://cdranalysis.blogspot.com/
--------------------------------
Vodafone CDR data
Mobile Evidence CDR/Billing Course
Call Detail Record (CDR) GSM Mobile Telephone Call

ABOUT THE BLOGS

Mobile Telephone Blogs Approved Access Only

I have endeavoured to be free with sharing knowledge and information over many years through my blogs, but given the changing economy, UK and global events and advancements in forensics, the nature of the technical content, new developments and examination techniques and legal information will only be accessible to approved law enforcement personnel, security specialists and authorised individuals. The following blogs are now approved access only:

Cell Site Analysis
http://cellsiteanalysis.blogspot.com

Forensic examination and evidence from SIM an USIM
http://sim2usim.blogspot.com

Forensic examination and evidence from Mobile and Smart Phones
http://forensicmobex.blogspot.com

Forensic analysis of Billing and CDR Records
http://cdranalysis.blogspot.com/

Mobile Telephone Evidence (http://trewmte.blogspot.com) will of course remain an open.

The criteria for authorised access to blogs:

a) Law Enforcement
b) Security Services (MI5, MI6, CID, SB, FBI....)
b1) Security Specialists - a proveable record in security for
networks, digital forensics, handsets, SIM, CDR etc
c) Authorised individuals

Tuesday, November 09, 2010

Mobile Telephone Blogs Approved Access Only

Mobile Telephone Blogs Approved Access Only

I have endeavoured to be free with sharing knowledge and information over the years through my blogs, but given the changing economy, UK and global events and advancements in forensics the nature of the technical content, new developments and examination techniques and legal information will only be accessible to approved law enforcement personnel, security specialists and authorised individuals. The following blogs are now approved access only:

Cell Site Analysis
http://cellsiteanalysis.blogspot.com

Forensic examination and evidence from SIM an USIM
http://sim2usim.blogspot.com

Forensic examination and evidence from Mobile and Smart Phones  
http://forensicmobex.blogspot.com

Mobile Telephone Evidence (http://trewmte.blogspot.com) will of course remain an open.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Mobile Telephone Case Law

Mobile Telephone Case Law
.
As you know for Judges, Lawyers, Practitioners, Experts, Law Enforcement and Students the webblog was set up for educational discussion points about mobile telephone forensics and evidence. Whilst visitors to this webblog liked the format and knowledge and experience being imparted, and want this to continue, due to the many posts I have put up since 2006 led to requests for having more discussion on these topics. To that end a discussion forum was set up relating to Mobile Forensics over at Jamie Morris' Forensic Focus Forum here:
Arising from the success of that we have now begun the extension of that fourm by introducing specialist sub-forums: the first sub-forum identifies case law that involves mobile telephone evidence to aid comprehension as to what principles are being argued at law regarding this subject matter; to learn about errors with evidence; to increase knowledge and act as an aid to improving skillsets.
.
Mobile Telephone Case Law
http://www.forensicfocus.com/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewforum&f=18
.
Below are a list of cases that have been posted to start this new specialist area sub-forum:
.
Mobile Phone Calls - Usage: Gun Crime Case
Call Records, Cell Site Analysis & Omagh Bombing
http://www.forensicfocus.com/index.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=4399
.
Civil Case about mobile phone functionality infringement
.
Movement, Collocation and Cell Site Analysis
Cell Site Analysis not available for Trial
Why wasn't Cell Site Analysis used?
.
I shall continue to add to the list of cases above.
.
Interception case
.
Conspiracy, mobile calls and text messages
.
Article: Courts wary of cellphone forensics
.
Thumbnail downloads, Mobile Phones and Google
.
US Cell Site Analysis cases
.
US Case: CSA, ESN/MIN and Cloning Equipment
.
Deleted data may not amount to possession
.
US Case: Electronic Wireless Vehicle Monitoring
.
US Case: Email interception defined
.
RIPA, Emails and Interception
.

Sunday, August 02, 2009

Non-Law Enforcement Mobile Forensics Conference UK

Non-Law Enforcement Mobile Forensics Conference UK
.
A queries that has been raised about "When and where are the Mobile Forensic Conferences usually held in the UK? Also are they open to non Law Enforcement?" A discussion about this is running over on the other website that I am connected with, which is owned by Jamie Morris, called Forensic Focus. My reply to the query is:
.
"We can have a Mobile Forensics Conference in the UK. The problem getting it off the ground is getting people to pay the entrance price or get the numbers to actually attend. It is impossible to hire a large enough conference centre when it presents high costs.
.
"I recently found a place where the combined costs for a suite for a 2-days conference, promotion of conference, producing handout material, getting conference speakers to attend and have some good grub (not that canteen cacky food that often gets thrown up) would generate an entrance charge of £150.00 + VAT per head but to breakeven 150 paying people attending the two days conference are needed.
.
"The agenda would need to reflect what people want to know more about or just to be able to attend and go through forensic and evidential issues to see if our understanding is the same.
.
"So here is something for Forensic Focus forum members to comment: Are there 150 forum members of the 10,000+ FF members willing to attend and more importantly can you afford and willing to pay £150 + VAT per person. I will create a new thread for this discussion containing a Poll to see what forum members would like to do."
.
The Poll is here:
.
To see or added to the discussion go here:
.
¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
UPDATE
¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
.
MTEB Mobile Forensics Conference UK we will be looking at the conservatively estimated £1-billion market for the criminal and civil mobile forensics marketplace. What are the likely business opportunites?
.
There will be the topics:
- Practises
- Procedures
- U/SIM Card
- Handsets
- Cell Site Analysis
- Directives
- Statutes
- Regulations
- Rules
- Standards
- etc
.
The list above is undefined because there will be new ideas and initiatives as we will be casting of the old, stagnated and stale that prevails in the marketplace - they are history.
.
A new, fresh age is starting in our forensic arena and you should be a part of it.